Digital twins in the asset lifecycle

are we there yet?

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

David Whitmore (Pcubed)

Ilias Krystallis (University College London)

E Papadonikolaki (TU Delft - Integral Design & Management)

Jordan Ford (Sellafield Limited)

Matt Cleaver (Sellafield Limited)

David Alexander (Pcubed)

Research Group
Integral Design & Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.23.00003
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Group
Integral Design & Management
Issue number
4
Volume number
177
Pages (from-to)
184-192
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

An academic–industry team present the results of research conducted into the current benefits being derived from the use of digital twins across the entire life cycle of an asset. The team reviewed the benefits being derived by the asset-management community, as it is through this that through life productivity and effectiveness benefits will be realised. The team conducted a review of relevant literature, surveyed 122 practitioners and worked with their industry partner and a UK professional body to validate their conclusions. Specifically, (a) the authors examined the current application of digital twins in three industry sectors: process industries, infrastructure (civil engineering) and manufacturing. (b) The authors grouped the data according to role types – namely, professionals working predominantly in design and build and professionals in the operation and maintenance part of the life cycle. As regards the sector results, the responses were found to be contradictory. When controlling by role type, the results are more cohesive. Individuals involved in the operation and maintenance stages consistently indicated that digital twins are not delivering on their promise. The authors present a series of problem statements to define the current state, together with some managerial recommendations, and the authors propose further work to establish detailed guidance for infrastructure sector projects.