Evaluation of Biomechanical Effects of Mandible Arch Types in All-on-4 and All-on-5 Dental Implant Design

A 3D Finite Element Analysis

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Sema Nur Sevinç Gül (Atatürk University)

Fahri Murat (Erzurum Technical University)

A.T. ŞENSOY (Samsun University, TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Research Group
Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16040134 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics
Journal title
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Issue number
4
Volume number
16
Article number
134
Downloads counter
20
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study evaluates the biomechanical effects of different implant configurations in various mandibular arch types using finite element analysis (FEA). Stress distribution and deformation patterns were analyzed under different loading conditions in square, U-shaped, and V-shaped arches. The results indicate that increasing the number of implants generally reduces cortical bone stress, particularly in U and V arches, while implant-level stress tends to increase. Under molar loading, cortical bone stress in the square arch decreased by 16.9% (from 90.61 MPa to 75.27 MPa) with the All-on-5 system, while implant stress in the V arch dropped by 46.26% (from 142.35 MPa to 76.5 MPa). Additionally, the cantilever effect in All-on-4 configurations resulted in higher stress on the prosthesis and implants, particularly in V arches. While the All-on-5 system provided better load distribution, the study highlights the importance of optimizing implant positioning based on mandibular anatomy. Despite limitations such as the use of static forces and standardized arch types, these findings offer valuable insights into the biomechanical performance of full-arch implant rehabilitations, supporting future clinical applications and research.