Pixel-wise assessment of cardiovascular magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion using a cardiac phantom mimicking transmural myocardial perfusion gradients
X. Milidonis (King’s College London)
Muhummad Sohaib Nazir (King’s College London)
Torben Schneider (King’s College London, Philips)
Myles Capstick (Zurich MedTech AG, Zurich)
S. Drost (TU Delft - Multi Phase Systems)
Gertjan Kok (VSL Dutch Metrology Institute)
Nikola Pelevic (VSL Dutch Metrology Institute)
C. Poelma (TU Delft - Multi Phase Systems)
Tobias Schaeffter (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt)
A. Chiribiri (King’s College London)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Purpose: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion for the pixel-wise detection of coronary artery disease is rapidly becoming the clinical standard, yet no widely available method exists for its assessment and validation. This study introduces a novel phantom capable of generating spatially dependent flow values to enable assessment of new perfusion imaging methods at the pixel level. Methods: A synthetic multicapillary myocardial phantom mimicking transmural myocardial perfusion gradients was designed and manufactured with high-precision 3D printing. The phantom was used in a stationary flow setup providing reference myocardial perfusion rates and was scanned on a 3T system. Repeated first-pass perfusion MRI for physiological perfusion rates between 1 and 4 mL/g/min was performed using a clinical dual-sequence technique. Fermi function-constrained deconvolution was used to estimate pixel-wise perfusion rate maps. Phase contrast (PC)-MRI was used to obtain velocity measurements that were converted to perfusion rates for validation of reference values and cross-method comparison. The accuracy of pixel-wise maps was assessed against simulated reference maps. Results: PC-MRI indicated excellent reproducibility in perfusion rate (coefficient of variation [CoV] 2.4-3.5%) and correlation with reference values (R2 = 0.985) across the full physiological range. Similar results were found for first-pass perfusion MRI (CoV 3.7-6.2%, R2 = 0.987). Pixel-wise maps indicated a transmural perfusion difference of 28.8-33.7% for PC-MRI and 23.8-37.7% for first-pass perfusion, matching the reference values (30.2-31.4%). Conclusion: The unique transmural perfusion pattern in the phantom allows effective pixel-wise assessment of first-pass perfusion acquisition protocols and quantification algorithms before their introduction into routine clinical use.