Inflicted head-injury by shaking-trauma in infants

the importance of spatiotemporal variations of the head’s rotation center

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Luuk A.H. Schiks (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

J Dankelman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Arjo Loeve (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology, Co van Ledden Hulsebosch Center for Forensic Science and Medicine)

Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Copyright
© 2023 L.A.H. Schiks, J. Dankelman, A.J. Loeve
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42373-x
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 L.A.H. Schiks, J. Dankelman, A.J. Loeve
Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Issue number
1
Volume number
13
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Inflicted head injury by shaking trauma (IHI-ST) in infants is a type of abusive head trauma often simulated computationally to investigate causalities between violent shaking and injury. This is commonly done with the head’s rotation center kept fixed over time. However, due to the flexibility of the infant’s neck and the external shaking motion imposed by the perpetrator it is unlikely that the rotation center is static. Using a test-dummy, shaken by volunteers, we demonstrated experimentally that the location of the head’s rotation center moves considerably over time. We further showed that implementation of a spatiotemporal-varying rotation center in an improved kinematic model resulted in strongly improved replication of shaking compared to existing methods. Hence, we stress that the validity of current infant shaking injury risk assessments and the injury thresholds on which these assessments are based, both often used in court cases, should be re-evaluated.