Magnetic resonance fingerprinting for simultaneous renal T1 and T2* mapping in a single breath-hold

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Ingo Hermann (University Heidelberg, TU Delft - ImPhys/Quantitative Imaging)

Jorge Chacon-Caldera (University Heidelberg)

Iréne Brumer (University Heidelberg)

Benedikt Rieger (University Heidelberg)

Sebastian Weingärtner (TU Delft - ImPhys/Quantitative Imaging)

Lothar R. Schad (University Heidelberg)

Frank G. Zöllner (University Heidelberg)

Research Group
ImPhys/Quantitative Imaging
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28160
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
ImPhys/Quantitative Imaging
Issue number
6
Volume number
83
Pages (from-to)
1940-1948
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the use of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) for simultaneous quantification of T1 and T*2 in a single breath-hold in the kidneys. Methods: The proposed kidney MRF sequence was based on MRF echo-planar imaging. Thirty-five measurements per slice and overall 4 slices were measured in 15.4 seconds. Group matching was performed for in-line quantification of T1 and T*2. Images were acquired in a phantom and 8 healthy volunteers in coronal orientation. To evaluate our approach, region of interests were drawn in the kidneys to calculate mean values and standard deviations of the T1 and T*2 times. Precision was calculated across multiple repeated MRF scans. Gaussian filtering is applied on baseline images to improve SNR and match stability. Results: T1 and T*2 times acquired with MRF in the phantom showed good agreement with reference measurements and conventional mapping methods with deviations of less than 5% for T1 and less than 10% for T*2. Baseline images in vivo were free of artifacts and relaxation times yielded good agreement with conventional methods and literature (deviation T1:7 ± 4%, T*2:6±3%). Conclusions: In this feasibility study, the proposed renal MRF sequence resulted in accurate T1 and T*2 quantification in a single breath-hold.