Hydraulic actuator selection for a compliant surgical bone drill

A theoretical approach

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Wouter Gregoor (Student TU Delft)

Jenny Dankelman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Christoph Kment (Austrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT))

Gabriëlle J.M. Tuijthof (Amsterdam UMC)

Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Copyright
© 2018 Wouter Gregoor, J. Dankelman, Christoph Kment, Gabriëlle J.M. Tuijthof
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5285
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 Wouter Gregoor, J. Dankelman, Christoph Kment, Gabriëlle J.M. Tuijthof
Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Issue number
7-8
Volume number
64
Pages (from-to)
425-436
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

A compliant bone drill provides advantages over conventional straight drills, because it allows surgical access via a minimally invasive approach. Hydropower allows the transfer of pressurized water with a compliant hose. The goal is to select the hydraulic actuator for this compliant bone drill by reviewing existing actuator principles. The selection was performed with a theoretical analysis. Design requirements were derived from a challenging minimally invasive bone drill procedure, and were set: a speed of 750 rpm, a torque of 0.015 Nm and a maximum dimensional volume of 5 mm × 5 mm × 10 mm to drill Ø 1.5 mm holes in human bone. A literature search was performed. For each actuator, the fluid flow and the required pressure difference were described as a function of the actuator dimensions and the rotational speed. Selection of the actuator was performed by it meeting the set output power, the torque, realistic input dimensions, and requiring the lowest pressure and number of parts. Existing literature provided six hydraulic actuators: external gear motor, gear ring motor, axial turbine, radial turbine, Pelton wheel, and Ossberger turbine. The latter four are hydrodynamic turbines, which could not meet the rotational speed. The external gear motor was selected for its lowest required pressure difference (11.5×105 Pa) and design simplicity. This theoretical design approach can be used for other applications.

Files

5285_29606_1_PB.pdf
(pdf | 1.87 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-01-2020
License info not available