A STATE OF LIMINALITY AND A LIMINAL STATE
Georgia’s political-geographical liminality ‘in-between’ conflicting powers (European Union and Russia) and the effect of trauma on the built environment
L.G. van Arendonk (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)
F. Geerts – Mentor (TU Delft - Theory, Territories & Transitions)
M.G.H. Schoonderbeek – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Theory, Territories & Transitions)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
This essay examines political-geographical liminality as a theoretical concept and its influence on the built environment. I will argue that liminality is strongly context-dependent and dynamic, highlighting how border regions often oscillate between ideological paradigms. The main research question of this essay will be: ‘How do liminality and oscillation between ideological paradigms influence the built environment?’ The essay will show that the effect of liminality takes form in a constant reshaping of a country's narrative. To fit the imagined identity, the built environment can become subject to alteration, as architecture and urban design can serve as physical manifestations of political agendas, cultural ideologies and historical memory. Shifts in geopolitical power and identity aspirations frequently leave their mark on cities, reshaping landscapes to align with dominant narratives and rejecting elements that contradict them. By exploring the connection between the large geopolitical scale and the smaller urban scale, the essay underscores how global and regional dynamics are inscribed into the local environment.
The concept of liminality, stemming from anthropological studies of rites of passage by Arnold van Gennep and later reinterpreted by Victor Turner captures the essence of ‘in-betweenness’ and will be explained more in-depth in the first chapter, Defining Liminality. The concept is characterised by ambiguity and has been interpreted in multiple ways, in the realm of political-geographical liminality, there is more consensus about what the concept entails and will, therefore, define the rest of this essay. The concept of liminality is very much spatially-bound and therefore chapter two, On the Periphery, will be about marginal spaces. Political-geographical liminality not only describes an in-between state but also underscores the tension between forces that shape identity, autonomy and spatial development, in chapter three, Trauma and the Built Environment, the attention will be drawn to the effect of liminality of a city’s built environment.