Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al.
Journal Article
(2017)
Author(s)
Lieke A. Melsen (Wageningen University & Research)
Paul Torfs (Wageningen University & Research)
R Uijlenhoet (Wageningen University & Research)
A. J. Teuling (Wageningen University & Research)
Affiliation
External organisation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020208
To reference this document use:
https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:a1007bd9-ff83-4015-94d9-b1aaae2fec72
More Info
expand_more
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Affiliation
External organisation
Issue number
3
Volume number
53
Pages (from-to)
2568-2569
Abstract
We discuss two definitions of reproducibility, and question if both definitions are required to be met in computational hydrological studies.
No files available
Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.