Platforms for the urban poor

Platform frugality in Mathare informal settlement

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Erwin van Tuijl (TU Delft - Urban Studies, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Jan Fransen ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Samuel Kiriro (Ghetto Foundation)

Harrison Kioko (International Centre for Frugal Innovation)

Alice Menya (International Centre for Frugal Innovation)

Research Group
Urban Studies
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106587
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Urban Studies
Volume number
169
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Limited attention has been paid to platforms in informal settlements, where residents face multiple, simultaneous resource constraints. We address this challenge by elucidating how informal settlement residents use platforms to address resource constraints and by identifying limitations to platform deployment. Conceptually, we combine literature on platforms and informal settlements with that on frugal innovation to distinguish various platform domains and introduce the concept of platform frugality to explain platform deployment. Based on an empirical case study of Mathare informal settlement, we reveal that platform frugality varies across domains. Social media and certain fintech platforms are more frugal than other platforms and are more widely deployed in informal settlements, addressing more resource constraints. More advanced fintech, gig, health, and utility platforms are rarely used in informal settlements. Generic limitations to platform deployment include costs and residents' lack of formal IDs.