Analysis of constitutive models for peat under deviatoric loading

Master Thesis (2023)
Author(s)

A. Camino Rios (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Contributor(s)

C. Jommi – Mentor (TU Delft - Geo-engineering)

S. Muraro – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Geo-engineering)

Z Li – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Railway Engineering)

Patricia Ammerlaan – Graduation committee member

Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Copyright
© 2023 Alberto Camino Rios
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Alberto Camino Rios
Graduation Date
25-05-2023
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Geo-Engineering
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The comprehensive assessment of the deviatoric behaviour in peats is paramount in ensuring the resilience of soil structures. The understanding of this material is riddled with intricacies, given its highly complex fabric, which includes organic matter such as fibers. This thesis evaluates the capabilities of a recent constitutive model (JMC) to adequately describe the response of peat by means of a flexible combination of constitutive ingredients, such as a non-associate flow rule and mixed volumetric and distortional hardening. The JMC model capabilities are tested with respect to laboratory and field data and compared against well-established models such as the NGI-ADP and Soft Soil (SS) model in a 3D FEM environment. The framework of reference is the measured response of the Bloemendalerpolder test, as it involves long-term consolidation, deviatoric behaviour, and soil-structure interaction. The results of this thesis demonstrate, that although the deformation pattern of the measurements is emulated effectively by the JMC and SS models, all the models show an overestimation of the lateral displacement compared to field data. Despite these limitations of the formulations and the modeling environment, the work shows the potential of the JMC model to reproduce reasonably deviatoric peat behaviour.

Files

License info not available