An integrated modelling framework for feedback-driven and mass-balanced circular economy analysis

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Salman Alfarisi (National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan)

Ryu Koide (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management, University of Tokyo, National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan)

Jennifer L. Hawkin (University of Sheffield)

Fanran Meng (University of Sheffield)

Takuma Watari (National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan)

Research Group
Energy and Industry
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.149117 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Energy and Industry
Journal title
Journal of Cleaner Production
Volume number
574
Article number
149117
Page Views
27
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Achieving a circular economy requires not only quantifying material stocks and flows but also understanding the dynamic processes that shape them over time. While Material Flow Analysis (MFA) is widely used to track physical stocks and flows, MFA has limited capacity to represent behavioral feedback, endogenous system responses, and temporal delays. System Dynamics (SD), by contrast, is well suited to capturing feedback structures and non-linear system behavior, but it does not inherently enforce mass conservation. Despite these fundamental differences, the two approaches are often applied without a clear conceptual distinction. Here, we compare and integrate MFA and SD to develop a modelling framework that is both mass balanced and feedback driven. Using three simplified models (MFA, SD, and integrated SD-MFA), we demonstrate that the integrated approach can simultaneously preserve mass balance and represent causal relationships, feedback loops, and time delays. The combined framework offers a more robust basis for analyzing circular economy transitions, enabling the assessment of not only how materials flow through systems, but also how socio-technical dynamics influence those flows over time.