Fast and fully-automated multi-criterial treatment planning for adaptive HDR brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

Journal Article (2020)
Authors

Michelle Oud (Erasmus MC, Student TU Delft)

Inger Karine Kolkman-Deurloo (Erasmus MC)

Jan Willem Mens (Erasmus MC)

D Lathouwers (TU Delft - RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials)

Zoltan Perko (TU Delft - RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials)

Ben J.M. Heijmen (Erasmus MC)

Sebastiaan Breedveld (Erasmus MC)

Research Group
RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials
Copyright
© 2020 Michelle Oud, Inger Karine Kolkman-Deurloo, J.W. Mens, D. Lathouwers, Z. Perko, Ben Heijmen, Sebastiaan Breedveld
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.017
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Michelle Oud, Inger Karine Kolkman-Deurloo, J.W. Mens, D. Lathouwers, Z. Perko, Ben Heijmen, Sebastiaan Breedveld
Research Group
RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials
Volume number
148
Pages (from-to)
143-150
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.017
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and evaluate a fast, automated multi-criterial treatment planning approach for adaptive high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary + interstitial brachytherapy (BT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods and materials: Twenty-two previously delivered single fraction MRI-based HDR treatment plans (SFclin) were used to guide training of our in-house system for multi-criterial autoplanning, aiming for an autoplan quality superior to the training plans, while respecting the clinically desired “pear-shaped” dose distribution. Next, the configured algorithm was used to automatically generate treatment plans for 63 other fractions (SFauto). The SFauto plans were compared to the corresponding SFclin plans in blind pairwise comparisons by an expert clinician. Then, the effect of adaptive autoplanning on total treatment (TT) plans (external beam + 3 BT fractions) was evaluated for 16 patients by simulating the clinically applied adaptive strategy to generate TTauto plans and compare them with the corresponding clinical treatments (TTclin). Results: In the blind comparisons, all SFauto plans were considered clinically acceptable. In 62/63 comparisons, SFauto plans were considered at least as good as, or better than the corresponding SFclin. The average optimization time for autoplanning was 20.5 ± 19.2 s (range 4.4–106.4 s) per plan. In 14 of 16 TTauto plans, the desired total dose of 90 Gy (EQD2) was obtained, compared to only 9 in the corresponding TTclin, while autoplanning also decreased bladder and rectum doses. Conclusions: Fast, fully-automated multi-criterial treatment planning for adaptive HDR-BT for locally advanced cervical cancer is feasible. Autoplans were superior to corresponding clinical plans.