No preconscious attentional bias towards itch in healthy individuals

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Jennifer M. Becker (Universiteit Leiden)

Henning Holle (University of Hull)

Dimitri M.L. van Ryckeghem (Maastricht University, Université du Luxembourg, Universiteit Gent)

Stefaan Van Damme (Universiteit Gent)

Geert Crombez (Universiteit Gent)

Dieuwke S. Veldhuijzen (Universiteit Leiden)

Andrea W.M. Evers (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering, Universiteit Leiden)

Ralph C.A. Rippe (Universiteit Leiden)

Antoinette I.M. van Laarhoven (Universiteit Leiden)

Research Group
Human Factors
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273581 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Research Group
Human Factors
Journal title
PLoS ONE
Issue number
9 September
Volume number
17
Article number
e0273581
Downloads counter
345
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Rapidly attending towards potentially harmful stimuli to prevent possible damage to the body is a critical component of adaptive behavior. Research suggests that individuals display an attentional bias, i.e., preferential allocation of attention, for consciously perceived bodily sensations that signal potential threat, like itch or pain. Evidence is not yet clear whether an attentional bias also exists for stimuli that have been presented for such a short duration that they do not enter the stream of consciousness. This study investigated whether a preconscious attentional bias towards itch-related pictures exists in 127 healthy participants and whether this can be influenced by priming with mild itch-related stimuli compared to control stimuli. Mild itch was induced with von Frey monofilaments and scratching sounds, while control stimuli where of matched modalities but neutral. Attentional bias was measured with a subliminal pictorial dot-probe task. Moreover, we investigated how attentional inhibition of irrelevant information and the ability to switch between different tasks, i.e., cognitive flexibility, contribute to the emergence of an attentional bias. Attentional inhibition was measured with a Flanker paradigm and cognitive flexibility was measured with a cued-switching paradigm. Contrary to our expectations, results showed that participants attention was not biased towards the itch-related pictures, in facts, attention was significantly drawn towards the neutral pictures. In addition, no effect of the itch-related priming was observed. Finally, this effect was not influenced by participants' attentional inhibition and cognitive flexibility. Therefore, we have no evidence for a preconscious attentional bias towards itch stimuli. The role of preconscious attentional bias in patients with chronic itch should be investigated in future studies.