Group fairness in power systems computation

Evaluating disparities in grid capacity between households with and without rooftop solar

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Eva de Winkel (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Flin Verdaasdonk (University of Twente)

Zofia Lukszo (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Werner van Westering (Alliander)

Mark Neerincx (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Roel Dobbe (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Energy and Industry
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2026.113585 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Energy and Industry
Journal title
Electric Power Systems Research
Volume number
262
Article number
113585
Downloads counter
7
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

“Fairness-aware” algorithms are increasingly used to allocate grid capacity in electrical power systems, yet they often overlook existing disparities between household groups, such as those arising from unequal rooftop solar adoption. Through simulations on a stylized low-voltage grid using electricity data from the Netherlands, we apply demographic parity, a group fairness metric, to compare differences in grid access and costs between households with and without rooftop solar. Three objectives are analyzed: minimal intervention, proportional fairness, and min-max fairness. The results indicate that (1) “fairness-aware” allocation does not eliminate group disparities, (2) voltage violations influence the distribution of burdens and benefits, (3) lower curtailment compensation can reduce disparities between households, and (4) common fairness evaluation metrics do not capture these group disparities. This study advances the discussion on fairness in power systems computation by encouraging further research on how to avoid reinforcing existing disparities.