How different sounds affect bodily responses and the perception of odour, light and temperature

A pilot study on interaction effects within IEQ domains

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

P.M. Bluyssen (TU Delft - Environmental & Climate Design)

A.B. Hamida (TU Delft - Environmental & Climate Design)

Alessandro D’Amico (Sapienza University of Rome)

Research Group
Environmental & Climate Design
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2025.2508233
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Environmental & Climate Design
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

During perception with our senses, interactions of different environmental stressors at brain level might occur. Previous studies have shown cross-modal effects between sound and odour. To test these effects of different sounds and levels of sounds on the perception of sound, temperature, odour, and light, as well as a number of physiological indicators, sixteen students were exposed to four different sounds (two indoor: mechanical ventilation & people talking; two outdoor: quiet rural area & city centre area) and two different sound pressure levels per sound, while sitting in a semi-lab environment. Bodily responses were sampled with wearable devices. Heart rate and breathing rate were monitored using a smart watch; EEG measurements were performed to assess their attention and mental relaxation levels; Acceptability and experience were assessed through a questionnaire to assess their comfort perception. Additionally, each student took a hearing test. The outcome showed when the traffic sound level increased, the students perceived the air as more smelly and less acceptable. The other sounds did not show any cross-modal effect. Moreover, heart rate and breathing rate significantly differed during the different tests, confirming that these two indicators can help to explain the physiological effect of noise as a stressor.