Haptic perception of force magnitude and its relation to postural arm dynamics in 3D

Journal Article (2015)
Author(s)

F.E. van Beek (Free University, Amsterdam)

WM Bergmann Tiest

W Mugge (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control, Free University, Amsterdam)

A.M.L. Kappers (Free University, Amsterdam)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2015 F.E. van Beek, WM Bergmann Tiest, W. Mugge, A.M.L. Kappers
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18004
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2015
Language
English
Copyright
© 2015 F.E. van Beek, WM Bergmann Tiest, W. Mugge, A.M.L. Kappers
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Volume number
5
Pages (from-to)
1 - 11
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In a previous study, we found the perception of force magnitude to be anisotropic in the horizontal plane. In the current study, we investigated this anisotropy in three dimensional space. In addition, we tested our previous hypothesis that the perceptual anisotropy was directly related to anisotropies in arm dynamics. In experiment 1, static force magnitude perception was studied using a free magnitude estimation paradigm. This experiment revealed a significant and consistent anisotropy in force magnitude perception, with forces exerted perpendicular to the line between hand and shoulder being perceived as 50% larger than forces exerted along this line. In experiment 2, postural arm dynamics were measured using stochastic position perturbations exerted by a haptic device and quantified through system identification. By fitting a mass-damper-spring model to the data, the stiffness, damping and inertia parameters could be characterized in all the directions in which perception was also measured. These results show that none of the arm dynamics parameters were oriented either exactly perpendicular or parallel to the perceptual anisotropy. This means that endpoint stiffness, damping or inertia alone cannot explain the consistent anisotropy in force magnitude perception.