Results from a multi-physics numerical benchmark for codes dedicated to molten salt fast reactors

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

M. Tiberga (TU Delft - RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials)

Rodrigo Gonzalez Gonzaga de Oliveira (Paul Scherrer Institut)

Eric Cervi (Politecnico di Milano)

Juan Antonio Blanco (Université Grenoble Alpes)

Stefano Lorenzi (Politecnico di Milano)

Manuele Aufiero (Université Grenoble Alpes)

Danny Lathouwers (TU Delft - RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials)

Pablo Rubiolo (Université Grenoble Alpes)

Research Group
RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials
Copyright
© 2020 M. Tiberga, Rodrigo Gonzalez Gonzaga de Oliveira, Eric Cervi, Juan Antonio Blanco, Stefano Lorenzi, Manuele Aufiero, D. Lathouwers, Pablo Rubiolo
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107428
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 M. Tiberga, Rodrigo Gonzalez Gonzaga de Oliveira, Eric Cervi, Juan Antonio Blanco, Stefano Lorenzi, Manuele Aufiero, D. Lathouwers, Pablo Rubiolo
Research Group
RST/Reactor Physics and Nuclear Materials
Volume number
142
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Verification and validation of multi-physics codes dedicated to fast-spectrum molten salt reactors (MSR) is a very challenging task. Existing benchmarks are meant for single-physics codes, while experimental data for validation are absent. This is concerning, given the importance numerical simulations have in the development of fast MSR designs. Here, we propose the use of a coupled numerical benchmark specifically designed to assess the physics-coupling capabilities of the aforementioned codes. The benchmark focuses on the specific characteristics of fast MSRs and features a step-by-step approach, where physical phenomena are gradually coupled to easily identify sources of error. We collect and compare the results obtained during the benchmarking campaign of four multi-physics tools developed within the SAMOFAR project. Results show excellent agreement for all the steps of the benchmark. The benchmark generality and the broad spectrum of results provided constitute a useful tool for the testing and development of similar multi-physics codes.