"I stood by and watched"

An autoethnography of stakeholder participation in a living lab

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Samuel Schrevel (De Haagse Hogeschool)

Meralda Slager (De Haagse Hogeschool)

Erwin De Vlugt (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering, De Haagse Hogeschool)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1400 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Journal title
Technology Innovation Management Review
Issue number
11
Volume number
10
Pages (from-to)
19-30
Downloads counter
261
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

An emerging and innovative way of organizing projects in health technology and innovation is the so-called "living lab". Because of their characteristics, living labs may provide a solution to a very old problem: How to facilitate the meaningful participation of stakeholders in science and technology? In this article, I (we use a first-person perspective in the paper) aim to contribute to the literature by providing an account of my experiences as a participation researcher with stakeholder participation in a living lab in the Netherlands. I participated in a yearlong project on ensuring freedom for residents in a closed psychogeriatric ward. Using three key moments from that experience, I illustrate why participation was the intention, but was harder to achieve in practice. Participation processes and living labs are situated in specific social and physical contexts. I discuss the "situatedness" of living labs and propose to reconceptualize them as "situated practices": The value of a living lab lies in the processes of work it conducts on specific innovations situated in its local context. A key conclusion is that providing narrative descriptions of living lab projects, with attention to situatedness and stakeholder participation, can provide invaluable examples, insights, and inspirations for other researchers in the field.