Fuel cell and electric vehicles

Resource use and associated environmental impacts

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Zhenyang Chen (Universiteit Leiden)

Rene Kleijn (Universiteit Leiden)

Chunbo Zhang (University College London, Universiteit Leiden)

H.X. Lin (Universiteit Leiden, TU Delft - Mathematical Physics)

Research Group
Mathematical Physics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108646
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Mathematical Physics
Volume number
226
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Achieving transport decarbonization depends on electric vehicle (EV) and fuel cell vehicle (FCV) deployment, yet their material demands and impacts vary by vehicle type. This study explores how powertrain preferences in light-duty vehicles (LDVs) and heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) shape future resource use and material-related environmental outcomes. Using dynamic material flow analysis and prospective life cycle assessment, we assess three scenarios. In the S3 EV-dominant scenario, 2050 lithium and cobalt demand rises by up to 11.9-fold and 1.8-fold relative to 2020, with higher global warming and human toxicity impacts. The S2 FCV-dominant scenario leads to a 21.7-fold increase in platinum-group metal demand, driving up freshwater ecotoxicity and particulate emissions. A balanced S1 scenario, EVs in LDVs and FCVs in HDVs, yields moderate material demand and environmental burdens. These findings demonstrate that no single pathway can fully resolve material-related impacts, while combining EVs and FCVs across LDVs and HDVs enables a more balanced and sustainable transition.