Open Sourcing Normative Assumptions on Privacy and Other Moral Values in Blockchain Applications

Doctoral Thesis (2019)
Author(s)

Georgy Ishmaev (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:ae329b13-9def-478e-8a92-300b21560981 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
ISBN (print)
978-94-028-1595-5
Downloads counter
557
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The moral significance of blockchain technologies is a highly debated and polarised topic, ranging from accusations that cryptocurrencies are tools serving only nefarious purposes such as cybercrime and money laundering, to the assessment of blockchain technology as an enabler for revolutionary positive social transformations of all kinds. Such technological determinism, however, hardly provides insights of sufficient depth on the moral significance of blockchain technology. This thesis argues rather, that very much like the cryptographic tools before them, blockchains develop in a constant feedback loop. Blockchain applications are driven by values, normative assumptions, and personal commitments of researchers, which shape moral effects of technology. At the same time these very assumption are often embedded in preexisting moral conception and ethical theories, implicitly or explicitly accepted by blockchain developers. And just as the introduction of one flawed element in the cryptographic application can have mass scale effects, the introduction of flawed normative assumptions can have far reaching consequences in blockchain applications.