Machine learning in microseismic monitoring

Review (2023)
Author(s)

Denis Anikiev (GFZ Helmholtz-Zentrum für Geoforschung)

Claire Birnie (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)

Umair bin Waheed (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals)

Tariq Alkhalifah (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)

Chen Gu (Tsinghua University)

DJ Eric Verschuur (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics, TU Delft - ImPhys/Verschuur group)

Leo Eisner (Seismik s.r.o, Prague)

Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
Copyright
© 2023 Denis Anikiev, Claire Birnie, Umair bin Waheed, Tariq Alkhalifah, Chen Gu, D.J. Verschuur, Leo Eisner
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104371
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Denis Anikiev, Claire Birnie, Umair bin Waheed, Tariq Alkhalifah, Chen Gu, D.J. Verschuur, Leo Eisner
Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
Volume number
239
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The confluence of our ability to handle big data, significant increases in instrumentation density and quality, and rapid advances in machine learning (ML) algorithms have placed Earth Sciences at the threshold of dramatic progress. ML techniques have been attracting increased attention within the seismic community, and, in particular, in microseismic monitoring where they are now being considered a game-changer due to their real-time processing potential. In our review of the recent developments in microseismic monitoring and characterisation, we find a strong trend in utilising ML methods for enhancing the passive seismic data quality, detecting microseismic events, and locating their hypocenters. Moreover, they are being adopted for advanced event characterisation of induced seismicity, such as source mechanism determination, cluster analysis and forecasting, as well as seismic velocity inversion. These advancements, based on ML, include by-products often ignored in classical methods, like uncertainty analysis and data statistics. In our assessment of future trends in ML utilisation, we also see a strong push toward its application on distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) data and real-time monitoring to handle the large amount of data acquired in these cases.