Individual versus Typical

The hidden definition of quality in the Deutscher Werkbund

Student Report (2022)
Author(s)

A.V. Alexandrov (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

Hilde Sennema – Mentor ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Copyright
© 2022 Artem Alexandrov
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Artem Alexandrov
Graduation Date
14-04-2022
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
['AR2A011']
Programme
['Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences']
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

At the turn of the 20th century in Germany, industrialisation led to a disconnect between the artist and their product. In response to the fears of cultural decay, the Deutscher Werkbund, an association of artists and craftsmen, was established in 1907. While its goal was to improve the quality of German design, it never officially defined the concept of quality. Its members theorised about it for years, but the debate between proponents for mass production and individualists broke out and swayed the historical interest away from quality.
In this study, the statements of the key figures of the Werkbund – Henry van de Velde, Hermann Muthesius, and Friedrich Naumann – are analysed to distil their theories on quality. The ideas behind quality creation, such as the production process and the physical characteristics of a product, are uncovered. When the stylistic discrepancies and historiographical biases are ignored, we see that the actors were trying to achieve the same goal – the highest quality – despite the multiplicity of opinions.
This study defines approaches to preserve the quality of products and work in a highly industrialised society. It outlines the ideas of personal creative freedom on the rise of mass production. These ideas are the lessons of those at the forefront of 20th-century industrialisation and are still relevant in present-day society.

Files

License info not available