Insight into the trade-off among economics, controllability, and resilience in pressure-swing distillation systems
Yu Wang (China University of Petroleum (East China))
Yifei Meng (China University of Petroleum (East China))
Shangzhi Liu (Shandong Institute of Chemical Safety Science, Jinan)
Meng Qi (China University of Petroleum (East China))
Mingqi Bai (China University of Petroleum (East China))
Yeyao Hu (China University of Petroleum (East China))
Yang Zheng (China University of Petroleum (East China))
Hao Sun (Anhui University of Technology)
Chengtian Cui (TU Delft - Applied Sciences, Åbo Akademi University)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Pressure-swing distillation (PSD) is an effective technique for separating azeotropes, yet it faces limitations due to high energy consumption and complex dynamic controllability. Heat integration (HI) enhances PSD's energy efficiency but diminishes control degrees of freedom (CDOF) and undermines process safety. This study adopts a resilience-based perspective to assess and enhance PSD control performance. Focusing on the partially heat-integrated PSD (PSD-PHI) system for methanol/acetone separation, rigorous simulations compare conventional (PSD-CONV) and heat-integrated alternatives with various control structures. Resilience is quantitatively evaluated via a previously developed framework, highlighting the impacts of process designs and controls. The PSD-CONV with independent pressure control shows superior resilience but the highest total annual cost (TAC). The economically favorable CS2 scheme, using pressure-compensated temperature control (PCTC), exhibits poor resilience from limited pressure deviation mitigation. Incorporating hot vapor bypass or auxiliary condenser boosts resilience to conventional levels while reducing energy use and TAC by 11–20%. Comprehensive trade-off analysis integrating economics, controllability, and resilience identifies CS5 as optimal for balanced performance and CS6 for stringent pressure stability. This resilience-integrated methodology supplements traditional economic-controllability assessments, providing a holistic framework for PSD. With industrial applicability, it enables chemical enterprises to achieve energy-efficient, safe distillation for low-carbon resilience.
Files
File under embargo until 18-09-2026