Oil and Water Recovery from Palm Oil Mill Effluent
A Comparative Study of PVDF and α-Al2O3 Ultrafiltration Membranes
S.A.A. Al-Muraisy (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)
Jiamin Wu (Student TU Delft)
M. Chen (TU Delft - ChemE/Product and Process Engineering)
M. Begum Tanis-Kanbur (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)
Bas Heijman (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)
Shahrul Bin Ismail (University Malaysia Terengganu (UMT))
J.B. Van Lier (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)
Ralph E.F. Lindeboom (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)
More Info
expand_more
Abstract
Recovering oil and water from palm oil mill effluent (POME) reduces environmental pollution and promotes sustainable practices. To assess the most effective recovery method, an experimental comparison was conducted between PVDF and α-Al2O3 ultrafiltration (UF) membranes at constant permeate of 20-50 LMH for PVDF and 20-70 LMH for α-Al2O3 membranes. Both membranes achieved 99.8 % chemical oxygen demand (COD) rejection, with oil concentration factor (Fo) of 186.8 % and 253.0 %, and water recovery (Rw) of 46.6 % and 60.5 %, respectively. The permeate water quality was superior to the Malaysian discharge standards, and the fat, oil, and grease (FOG) content was suitable for phase separation processes. The optimal permeate fluxes, with stable transmembrane pressures (TMP), were observed at 40 LMH (PVDF) and 60 LMH (α-Al2O3). Total resistance (Rt) values were 1.30 ×1012 m-1 (PVDF) and 1.59 ×1012 m-1 (α-Al2O3). The ratio of irreversible to total resistances (Rir/Rt) was 0.02 (PVDF) and 0.06 (α-Al2O3), indicating minimal irreversible fouling. Overall, the α-Al2O3 membrane demonstrated superior performance for oil and water recovery with more stable operation compared to the PVDF membrane. UF membrane technology emerges as an efficient technique for recovering oil and water compared to conventional methods.
No files available
Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.