Ergonomics and human factors: still fading—and why we need to embrace the AI revolution

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Joost C.F.De de Winter (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Yke Bauke B. Eisma (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2509352
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Many of the commentators use the opportunity to highlight the value of Ergonomics and Human Factors (EHF) and challenge the notion that the discipline is fading. In response, we argue that EHF science is lagging behind the rapid developments in AI, remains entrenched in past-century achievements, and is in decline. Indices such as membership counts, conference attendance numbers, and new regulations reflect activity, but not necessarily impact. Important questions about human-AI collaboration are being addressed by other disciplines, often without the involvement of EHF. Rather than advocating for systemic frameworks, we advocate for new skill development and the adoption of data-driven AI methods. To illustrate the potential of AI within EHF, we demonstrate how a vision-language model can replicate findings from a classic knobs-and-dials study. In conclusion, we acknowledge EHF’s knowledge base but foresee existential risks unless the field undergoes major reforms to remain relevant in an AI-dominated future.