Rethinking Machine Learning Performance Metrics in Distributed Energy Resource Systems

A Concise Review

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Qiushi Li (Concordia University)

Chengming Hu (McGill University)

Jun Yan (Concordia University)

Jie Gao (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Hepeng Li (University of Maine)

Yuhong Liu (Santa Clara University)

Xiao'ou Yang (Santa Clara University)

Dafang Zhao (Osaka University)

Research Group
Transport, Mobility and Logistics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1145/3765611.3815506 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Transport, Mobility and Logistics
Pages (from-to)
162-171
Publisher
ACM
ISBN (electronic)
9798400721991
Event
2026 ACM Sustainability Week, ACM Sustainability Week Companion 2026 (2026-06-22 - 2026-06-25), Banff, Canada
Downloads counter
35
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) techniques have been widely applied to distributed energy resource (DER) systems for a broad range of tasks, including load forecasting and operational control. However, evaluation practices remain inconsistent, conflating ML performance with DER system-level performance without a clear, systematic relationship, thereby limiting the interpretability and practical applicability of emerging ML applications in DER contexts. To this end, this paper introduces a hierarchical evaluation framework that systematically aligns ML performance with DER operational objectives. Specifically, this paper first discusses how ML-driven DER systems are currently evaluated, providing a comprehensive overview of performance evaluation metrics, their advantages and limitations, and practical insights. Given the challenges in evaluating ML-driven DER systems, we further organize performance evaluation metrics hierarchically, grouping them into six top-level categories that represent core DER objectives. Within each category, metrics are distinguished between ML-side and energy-side evaluation criteria. Consequently, our hierarchical DER-centric evaluation framework not only provides transparent interpretability of ML performance in the DER context but also clarifies recurring sources of confusion in current practice, particularly when ML performance is overgeneralized or implicitly assumed to reflect DER system-level performance. Finally, we highlight the challenges and identify future opportunities associated with the proposed hierarchical evaluation framework. This work serves as a valuable reference for researchers and engineers to better understand existing studies, as well as the potential, challenges, and opportunities in evaluating ML-driven DER solutions.