Quantification of Error Sources with Inertial Measurement Units in Sports

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Haye Kamstra (Student TU Delft)

Erik Wilmes (Royal Netherlands Football Association, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

F.C.T. van der Helm (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2022 Haye Kamstra, Erik Wilmes, F.C.T. van der Helm
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249765
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Haye Kamstra, Erik Wilmes, F.C.T. van der Helm
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Issue number
24
Volume number
22
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the possibility to capture the lower body motions of players of outdoor team sports. However, various sources of error are present when using IMUs: the definition of the body frames, the soft tissue artefact (STA) and the orientation filter. Methods to minimize these errors are currently being used without knowing their exact influence on the various sources of errors. The goal of this study was to present a method to quantify each of the sources of error of an IMU separately. Methods: An optoelectronic system was used as a gold standard. Rigid marker clusters (RMCs) were designed to construct a rigid connection between the IMU and four markers. This allowed for the separate quantification of each of the sources of error. Ten subjects performed nine different football-specific movements, varying both in the type of movement, and in movement intensity. Results: The error of the definition of the body frames (11.3–18.7 deg RMSD), the STA (3.8–9.1 deg RMSD) and the error of the orientation filter (3.0–12.7 deg RMSD) were all quantified separately for each body segment. Conclusions: The error sources of IMU-based motion analysis were quantified separately. This allows future studies to quantify and optimize the effects of error reduction techniques.