Joule Thomson CO2 Cooling Under Different Regime Heating by Adjacent Layers

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

C. Chesnokov (University of Adelaide)

R. Farajzadeh (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Shell Global Solutions International B.V.)

K. M. Fedorov (University of Tyumen)

P. Bedrikovetsky (University of Adelaide)

Research Group
Reservoir Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2118/230576-MS Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Reservoir Engineering
Article number
SPE-230576-MS
Publisher
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
ISBN (print)
9781959025924
Event
SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 2026 (2026-02-18 - 2026-02-20), Lafayette, United States
Downloads counter
9
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Heat exchange with surrounding formations and Joule–Thomson cooling during CO2 injection into deep saline aquifers and depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs can lead to substantial declines in well injectivity. This work addresses these challenges by introducing an analytical model for non-isothermal CO2 injection that accounts for both JT cooling and inter-formation heat exchange, assuming that heat transfer begins upon arrival of the temperature front rather than the gas–water front, as adopted in earlier models. An exact 1D solution is derived, providing closed-form expressions for temperature and pressure profiles. Model performance is evaluated through comparison with an exact 2D solution obtained from reservoir energy conservation. The new formulation demonstrates markedly improved accuracy over the previous model. The solution predicts a temperature drop from the injection temperature at the wellbore to a minimum at the temperature front, followed by a rapid rise back to the initial reservoir temperature. Mapping the evolving temperature and pressure profiles onto a (T, p) phase diagram enables assessment of hydrate-formation risk and identification of the distance from the injection well where hydrates may form.

Files

Spe-230576-ms.pdf
(pdf | 4.43 Mb)
Taverne
warning

File under embargo until 11-08-2026