Crop flood damage assessment integrating Sentinel-2 imagery and in situ data

the 2023 Emilia-Romagna case

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Filippo Bocchino (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Sapienza University of Rome)

Valeria Belloni (Sapienza University of Rome)

Roberta Ravanelli (Université de Liège)

Camillo Zaccarini (Institute of Services for Agricultural and Food Market (ISMEA))

Mattia Crespi (Sapienza University of Rome)

Roderik Lindenbergh (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Research Group
Optical and Laser Remote Sensing
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101852 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Optical and Laser Remote Sensing
Journal title
Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment
Volume number
41
Article number
101852
Downloads counter
34
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Floods are among the most severe consequences of climate change, causing significant damage across several sectors, including agriculture. Nevertheless, the assessment of agricultural flood damage remains limited, particularly in agriculturally intensive regions where timely support is crucial. This work proposes a data-driven approach for assessing crop flood damage through a machine learning classification framework applied to features derived from Earth Observation (EO) data, trained and tested on field-level damage data collected by agronomists. Specifically, we applied a Random Forest model to classify fields into three damage classes by integrating Sentinel-2–derived indices, topographic information, and flood extent maps. The analysis focused on the flood event that struck the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) in May 2023, one of the costliest floods globally that year. The model was trained and tested on 412 fields, achieving an overall accuracy of 0.74, with precision, recall, and F1 score of 0.75, 0.74, and 0.74, each with a standard deviation of 0.04, indicating stable model performance. The model accurately identified high-damage fields, which were characterized by greater flood exposure, lower elevations, and pronounced declines in vegetation indices. However, it struggled to distinguish between no-damage and medium-damage fields, particularly for permanent crops, where damage often occurs beneath the canopy and flooded areas may be partially occluded. The main novelty of this work lies in the use of in situ crop damage assessments, enabling a data-driven estimation of flood impacts. These results have direct implications for policymakers: the framework relies on free EO data, providing a tool that can support post-event compensation and decision-making in flood-prone regions.