TREM2 risk variants and associated endophenotypes in alzheimer’s disease

Journal Article (2025)
Authors

Janna I. R. Dijkstra (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC)

Lisa Vermunt (Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Vikram Venkatraghavan (Amsterdam UMC)

Georgii Ozhegov (Amsterdam UMC)

Emma M. Coomans (Amsterdam UMC)

Rik Ossenkoppele (Amsterdam UMC, Lund University, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Elsmarieke van de Giessen (Amsterdam UMC)

Marc Hulsman (Amsterdam UMC, TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Sven J. van der Lee (Amsterdam UMC)

Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01700-2
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
Issue number
1
Volume number
17
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01700-2
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background
Rare variants of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 2 (TREM2) gene are strong risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and drugs targeting the TREM2 protein are being developed. However, it is unknown what the effect of TREM2 variants is on the AD phenotype.

Methods
Here we studied a full range of clinical and biomarker measures in a large cohort of TREM2 variant carriers (n = 123, 7.8%, i.e., R62H n = 66, R47H n = 26, T96K n = 16, other TREM2 variants n = 17) compared to confirmed non-carriers (n = 1,459) with biomarker confirmed symptomatic AD from Amsterdam Dementia Cohort. Secondly, we explored whether specific TREM2 variants were associated with distinct clinical measures compared to the reference group, i.e. non-carriers, within the same cohort.

Results
TREM2 variant carriers (64 ± 7 years, 54% female) did not show distinct clinical measures of AD at presentation compared to AD patients not carrying a TREM2 variant (64 ± 7 years, 52% female). We observed no differences in MMSE, neuropsychological domains (except less impaired visuospatial functioning in TREM2 carriers), MRI scores, CSF biomarkers, EEG, structural MRI (41 ROIs) and Tau-PET scans of four carriers (R62H, R47H, G58A, D87N). Carriers did show faster cognitive decline (MMSE points per year 0.6 ± 0.3, P fdr = 0.099) compared to non-carriers. Notably, both R47H and T96K carriers exhibited faster cognitive decline (P < 0.05), and R47H carriers even showed an increased rate of death after diagnosis (P = 0.034). In contrast to the shared cognitive decline, these variants showed different results for other measures at baseline.

Conclusions
This study shows that while carriers of TREM2 risk variants cannot be distinguished based on clinical presentation at baseline compared to non-carriers, they do exhibit a faster global cognitive decline. Variant-specific analyses indicate that especially R47H and T96K carriers drive this association. These results highlight the importance of considering variant-specific effects for understanding the role of TREM2 biology in AD. The rich phenotype information can inform clinical stage drug development.