Big AI's Regulatory Capture

Mapping Industry Interference and Government Complicity

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Abeba Birhane (Trinity College Dublin)

Riccardo Angius (Trinity College Dublin)

William Agnew (Carnegie Mellon University)

Harshvardhan J. Pandit (Trinity College Dublin)

Bhaskar Mitra (Independent researcher)

Roel Dobbe (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Zeerak Talat (The University of Edinburgh)

Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1145/3805689.3806740 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
Pages (from-to)
2586-2607
Publisher
ACM
ISBN (electronic)
979-8-4007-2596-8
Event
9th Annual ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ACM FAccT 2026 (2026-06-25 - 2026-06-28), Montreal, Canada
Downloads counter
42
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Over the past decade, the AI industry has come to exert an unprecedented economic, political and societal power and influence. The well-functioning of regulatory and oversight structures and processes that govern the industry thus have paramount ramifications for everything from fostering public trust in systems marketed as AI, the credibility of scientific knowledge, educational and healthcare services and products, information ecosystems, the environment, rule of law and integrity of democratic process. It it therefore critical that we comprehend the extent and depth of pervasive and multifaceted capture of AI regulation by corporate actors in order to contend and challenge it. In this paper, we first develop a taxonomy of mechanisms enabling capture to provide a comprehensive understanding of the problem. Grounded in design science research (DSR) methodologies and extensive scoping review of existing literature and media reports, our taxonomy of capture consists of 27 mechanisms across five categories. We then develop an annotation template incorporating our taxonomy, and manually annotate and analyse 100 news articles. The purpose behind this analysis is twofold: validate our taxonomy and provide a novel quantification of capture mechanisms and dominant narratives. Our analysis identifies 249 instances of capture mechanisms, often co-occurring with narratives that rationalise such capture. We find that the most recurring categories of mechanisms are Discourse & Epistemic Influence, concerning narrative framing, and Elusion of law, related to violations and contentious interpretations of antitrust, privacy, copyright and labour laws. We further find that Regulation stifles innovation, Red tape and National Interest are the most frequently invoked narratives used to rationalise capture. We emphasize the extent and breadth of regulatory capture by coalescing forces - Big AI and governments - as something policy makers and the public ought to treat as an emergency. Finally, we put forward key lessons learned from other industries along with transferable tactics for uncovering, resisting and challenging Big AI capture as well as in envisioning counter narratives.