Using forest-based models to personalise ventilation treatment in the ICU

Optimising positive end-expiratory pressure assignment based on the MIMIC-IV dataset

Bachelor Thesis (2024)
Author(s)

H.D. Nowak (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

J.H. Krijthe – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

R.K.A. Karlsson – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

J.M. Smit – Mentor (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Jasmijn A. Baaijens – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Graduation Date
25-06-2024
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
CSE3000 Research Project
Programme
Computer Science and Engineering
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is one of the components of mechanical ventilation treatment for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Correct PEEP level can reduce additional lung injuries sustained during the hospitalisation, significantly increasing patients' chances for survival. In this paper, we focus on estimating the difference in patient mortality when assigned high or low PEEP level. We look at three machine learning models specifically designed for such tasks: S-learner, T-learner and causal forest. Through a series of experiments, we determine their best use cases based on simulated data and measure their performance on a real-life dataset - MIMIC-IV. In our analysis, we find that after tuning the hyperparameters, the models can, to some degree, make valuable predictions and reveal heterogeneity in the treatment effect. However, when evaluated on a separate dataset, the models' performance drops significantly.

Files

RP_Paper_final.pdf
(pdf | 0.712 Mb)
License info not available