A commentary on “how to interpret expert judgment assessments of twenty-first century sea-level rise” by Hylke de Vries and Roderik SW van de Wal

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

J. L. Bamber (University of Bristol)

W.P. Aspinall (University of Bristol)

Roger Cooke (TU Delft - Applied Probability)

Research Group
Applied Probability
Copyright
© 2016 J.L. Bamber, W.P. Aspinall, R.M. Cooke
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1672-7
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 J.L. Bamber, W.P. Aspinall, R.M. Cooke
Research Group
Applied Probability
Issue number
3-4
Volume number
137
Pages (from-to)
321-328
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

We clarify key aspects of the evaluation, by de Vries and van de Wal (2015), of our expert elicitation paper on the contributions of ice sheet melting to sea level rise due to future global temperature rise scenarios (Bamber and Aspinall 2013), and extend the conversation with further analysis of their proposed approach for combining expert uncertainty judgments.