Autoregressive Support Sampling for Montage-Agnostic EEG Source Imaging

Master Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

L. Sibi (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

Lydia Y. Chen – Mentor (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Aditya Shankar – Mentor (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Luigi Serio – Mentor (CERN)

Andrea Protani – Mentor (CERN)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Graduation Date
16-10-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Computer Science
Sponsors
CERN
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Page Views
3
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Electroencephalography Source Imaging (ESI) reconstructs cortical activity from scalp measurements. Current methods face three distinct bottlenecks: they require externally computed leadfields, struggle to generalize across varying electrode montages, and often produce deterministic point estimates that ignore spatial uncertainty. We introduce a geometry-conditioned architecture that overcomes these limitations by processing continuous 3D electrode coordinates. The imager predicts an internal leadfield to bypass external forward models at inference, while an autoregressive decoder samples alternative sets of active parcels to model spatial ambiguity. On matched 256-channel synthetic data, our deterministic estimate reduces median localization error by 13.4% to 9.7 mm and increases AUPRC from 0.749 to 0.787. This mapping successfully transfers to real clinical EEG featuring known intracranial stimulation sites. The autoregressive architecture reduces median peak-to-site distance by 15.5% to 22.3 mm relative to the best-performing baseline. Furthermore, training the imager jointly across four standard layouts enables genuine zero-shot transfer to unseen 21-, 76-, and 256-channel montages. On these unseen configurations, the median localization error ranges from 10.4 to 16.5 mm, remaining comparable to the 10.6 mm error achieved on the training layouts.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 16-12-2026