Modeling and simulation of intrinsic uncertainties in validation of collision avoidance systems

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Sybert H. Stroeve (Royal Netherlands Aerospace Centre)

Henk A.P. Blom (TU Delft - Air Transport & Operations, Royal Netherlands Aerospace Centre)

Carlos Hernandez Medel (Everis Aerospace and Defence)

Carlos Garcia Daroca (Everis Aerospace and Defence)

Alvaro Arroyo Cebeira (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Everis Aerospace and Defence)

Stanislaw Drozdowski (EUROCONTROL)

Research Group
Air Transport & Operations
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.D0187
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Air Transport & Operations
Issue number
4
Volume number
28
Pages (from-to)
173-183
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Airborne collision avoidance systems (ACASs) form a key safety barrier by providing last-moment resolution advisories (RAs) to pilots for avoiding midair collisions. Intrinsic uncertainties, such as noise in ACAS input signals and variability in pilot performance, imply that the generation of RAs and the effectuated aircraft trajectories are nondeterministic processes. Existing ACAS validation methods reflect the intrinsic uncertainties to a limited extent only. This paper develops an agent-based model, which systematically captures uncertainties in ACAS input and pilot performance for Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of encounter scenarios. The agent-based model has been integrated with industry-specific implementations of Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System II and ACAS Xa in a novel collision avoidance validation and evaluation tool. Through illustrative MC simulation results, it is demonstrated that the intrinsic uncertainties can have a significant effect on the variability in timing and types of RAs, and subsequently on the variability in miss distance. Even the MC simulation estimated mean miss distance can differ significantly from the deterministically simulated miss distance. Most important, the tails of miss distance probability distributions and probabilities of near-midair collisions are affected. This stipulates that addressing intrinsic uncertainties through MC simulation is essential in evaluating ACASs.

Files

License info not available