Liminal Spaces of Memory and Remembrance

Realignment of Agonistic Interpretations at Sites of Complex Histories in Sarajevo

Book Chapter (2025)
Author(s)

Selma Ćatović Hughes (Independent researcher)

S. Tanović (TU Delft - Teachers of Practice / A)

Research Group
Teachers of Practice / A
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004736887_006
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Teachers of Practice / A
Pages (from-to)
120-144
Publisher
Brill
ISBN (print)
978-90-04-73682-5
ISBN (electronic)
978-90-04-73688-7
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In the Oscar-winning film No Man’s Land (2001), a Serbian and a Bosnian soldier are trapped between the frontlines of the opposing armies, in a trench positioned in no man’s land. Although awkward, the situation is not tragic until the two soldiers discover another Bosnian soldier, presumed dead but who then gains consciousness while lying on an unexploded mine. The slow progression of the film’s plot hints at a potential for development of an agonistic forum between the protagonists, which opens with the question ‘who started the war?’, asked by whichever soldier is in possession of a gun. While this discussion is acted out relying on humor, this scene in the movie is critical in terms of relativisation of history and clarity of historical facts – contrary to the cinematic storyline, there is no confusion about who started the aggression on Bosnia and Herzegovina. Further into the movie plot, United Nations (UN) peacekeeping units were forced into action by a journalist who suspected the UN’s indifference to act even in emergency situations. Similarly, Joe Sacco’s non-fiction graphic novel The Fixer: A Story from Sarajevo (2003) opens up the complexity of ‘the great Siege of Sarajevo’ from within, as the narrative focuses on ‘war within the war’ wherein the main protagonists are local criminals profiting from war and dubious government decisions. Both examples end with a moot prospect for an agonistic space of living, either among the hostile ethnic parties or within the international community with its failure to successfully resolve the issue. [...]