Making and embedding humane technologies: can artistic practices provide normative guidance?

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Janna Van Grunsven (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Copyright
© 2021 J.B. van Grunsven
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712321995229
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 J.B. van Grunsven
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Issue number
6
Volume number
30
Pages (from-to)
569-571
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In this commentary, I raise one question and one critical comment about Rietveld’s normative claim that ‘artistic practices afford embedding technologies better in society’ (2019, p. 5). In what exact sense is this the case? It seems that Rietveld offers two interconnected but conceptually distinct answers to this question. The first focuses on art’s habit-breaking possibilities. The second concerns art’s ability to make the lived experiences of the stakeholders potentially affected by a given technology experientially concrete. I will discuss both points, and why I think more needs to be said about them.