Motivated Numeracy and Active Reasoning in a Western European Sample

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Paul Connor (University of California)

Mark Alfano (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Nava Tintarev (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)

Mark Alfano (Macquarie University)

Emily Sullivan (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Research Group
Web Information Systems
Copyright
© 2020 Paul Connor, Emily Sullivan, N. Tintarev, Mark Alfano, Emily Sullivan
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.32
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Paul Connor, Emily Sullivan, N. Tintarev, Mark Alfano, Emily Sullivan
Research Group
Web Information Systems
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Recent work by Kahan et al. (2017) on the psychology of motivated numeracy in the context of intracultural disagreement suggests that people are less likely to employ their capabilities when the evidence runs contrary to their political ideology. This research has so far been carried out primarily in the USA regarding the liberal–conservative divide over gun control regulation. In this paper, we present the results of a modified replication that included an active reasoning intervention with Western European participants regarding both the hierarchy–egalitarianism and individualism–collectivism divides over immigration policy (n = 746; considerably less than the preregistration sample size). We reproduce the motivated numeracy effect, though we do not find evidence of increased polarization of high-numeracy participants.