Understanding Stakeholder Preferences in Integrated Freight and Passenger Transport Systems

A mixed methods study on design factors influencing participation

Master Thesis (2025)
Author(s)

S.J. van Vliet (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Contributor(s)

Wijnand Veeneman – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

P.S.A. Stokkink – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

M. Saeednia – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Transport, Mobility and Logistics)

T.C. Weisshaar – Mentor (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Graduation Date
21-08-2025
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Complex Systems Engineering and Management (CoSEM)']
Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Integrated Passenger–Freight Transport (IPFT) systems are increasingly proposed to improve efficiency, reduce emissions, and sustain service viability where conventional mobility options face pressure. Yet the conditions under which stakeholders are willing to participate remain underexplored. This study applies a mixed methods design to examine stakeholder evaluations of demand-responsive IPFT services. Two stated preference surveys were conducted in the Netherlands among passengers (N=166) and freight recipients (N=187), each combining rating and choice experiments. Comfort and delivery quality constructs derived from rating tasks were integrated into multinomial and panel mixed logit models. In parallel, five semi-structured interviews with public transport operators, logistics providers, and municipal actors were thematically analysed. Findings show convergence on spatial separation, predictable operations, and off-peak vehicle use, while divergences emerged over costs, staffing, service hours, and institutional responsibilities. The study shows that implementation requires stakeholder alignment and advances four scenario-based configurations to guide design and policy.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 31-08-2026