The Context Debate

An Archaeology

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

E. Komez-Daglioglu (TU Delft - OLD Public Buiding)

Research Group
OLD Public Buiding
Copyright
© 2016 E. Komez-Daglioglu
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2016.1170058
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 E. Komez-Daglioglu
Research Group
OLD Public Buiding
Issue number
2
Volume number
20
Pages (from-to)
266-279
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Context is a crucial concept in architecture in spite of the frequent ambiguity around its use. Although the consideration of context is intrinsic to the process of architectural design, in contemporary theory, little attention is paid to it. By way of contrast, in the 1950s, various architects, theorists, and teachers cultivated several perspectives on context as a way of addressing some of the ill effects of modern architectural orthodoxy. Although a topic of layered and productive debate in the post-war years, context fell into disrepute in the critical architectural discourse of the 1980s. This paper provides an archaeology of the “context debate” in the hope that it may be possible to reveal its forgotten dimensions and flexibility.