Validation of wearable visual feedback for retraining foot progression angle using inertial sensors and an augmented reality headset

Journal Article (2018)
Authors

Angelos Karatsidis (University of Twente, Xsens Technologies)

Rosie E. Richards (Amsterdam UMC)

Jason M. Konrath (Xsens Technologies)

Josien C. van den Noort (Amsterdam UMC)

H. Martin Schepers (Xsens Technologies)

Giovanni Bellusci (Xsens Technologies)

Jaap Harlaar (Amsterdam UMC, TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Peter H. Veltink (University of Twente)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2018 Angelos Karatsidis, Rosie E. Richards, Jason M. Konrath, Josien C. Van Den Noort, H. Martin Schepers, Giovanni Bellusci, J. Harlaar, Peter H. Veltink
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0419-2
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 Angelos Karatsidis, Rosie E. Richards, Jason M. Konrath, Josien C. Van Den Noort, H. Martin Schepers, Giovanni Bellusci, J. Harlaar, Peter H. Veltink
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Volume number
15
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0419-2
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Gait retraining interventions using real-time biofeedback have been proposed to alter the loading across the knee joint in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Despite the demonstrated benefits of these conservative treatments, their clinical adoption is currently obstructed by the high complexity, spatial demands, and cost of optical motion capture systems. In this study we propose and evaluate a wearable visual feedback system for gait retraining of the foot progression angle (FPA). Methods: The primary components of the system are inertial measurement units, which track the human movement without spatial limitations, and an augmented reality headset used to project the visual feedback in the visual field. The adapted gait protocol contained five different target angles ranging from 15 degrees toe-out to 5 degrees toe-in. Eleven healthy participants walked on an instrumented treadmill, and the protocol was performed using both an established laboratory visual feedback driven by optical motion capture, and the proposed wearable system. Results and conclusions: The wearable system tracked FPA with an accuracy of 2.4 degrees RMS and ICC=0.94 across all target angles and subjects, when compared to an optical motion capture reference. In addition, the effectiveness of the biofeedback, reflected by the number of steps with FPA value ±2 degrees from the target, was found to be around 50% in both wearable and laboratory approaches. These findings demonstrate that retraining of the FPA using wearable inertial sensing and visual feedback is feasible with effectiveness matching closely an established laboratory method. The proposed wearable setup may reduce the complexity of gait retraining applications and facilitate their transfer to routine clinical practice.