Autonomic responses to pressure sensitivity of head, face and neck

Heart rate and skin conductance

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

W. Yang (School of Design Hunan University, Harbin Ergineering University Yantai Research Institute)

Tingshu Chen (School of Design Hunan University)

Renke He (School of Design Hunan University)

RHM Goossens (TU Delft - Human-Centered Design, TU Delft - Human Factors)

Toon Huysmans (TU Delft - Human Factors)

Department
Human-Centered Design
Copyright
© 2024 W. Yang, Tingshu Chen, Renke He, R.H.M. Goossens, T. Huysmans
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104126
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Copyright
© 2024 W. Yang, Tingshu Chen, Renke He, R.H.M. Goossens, T. Huysmans
Department
Human-Centered Design
Volume number
114
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Subjective scales are frequently used in the design process of head-related products to assess pressure discomfort. Nevertheless, some users lack fundamental cognitive and motor abilities (e.g., paralyzed patients). Therefore, it is vital to find non-verbal measurements of pressure discomfort and pressure pain. This study gathered the autonomic response data (heart rate and skin conductance) of 30 landmarks in head, neck and face from 31 participants experiencing pressure discomfort and pressure pain. The results indicate that pressure stimulation can change heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC). SC can be more useful in assessing pressure discomfort than HR for specific landmarks, and SC also possesses a faster arousal rate than HR. Moreover, HR decreased in response to pressure stimulation, while SC decreased followed by an increase. In comparisons between genders, the subjective pressure discomfort threshold (PDT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) of women were lower than those of men, but men's autonomic responses (HR and SC) were more intense. Furthermore, there was no linear correlation between subjective pressure thresholds (PDT and PPT) and autonomic response intensity. This study has significant implications for resolving ergonomic issues (pressure discomfort and pain) associated with head-related products.

Files

1_s2.0_S0003687023001643_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 5.4 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 26-02-2024
License info not available