Design thinking in action

A quantitative study of design thinking practices in innovation projects

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Claudio Dell’Era (Politecnico di Milano)

Stefano Magistretti (Politecnico di Milano)

Marina Candi (Reykjavik University)

Mattia Bianchi (Stockholm School of Economics)

Giulia Calabretta (TU Delft - DesIgning Value in Ecosystems)

Ileana Stigliani (Imperial College Business School)

Roberto Verganti (Politecnico di Milano, Stockholm School of Economics)

Research Group
DesIgning Value in Ecosystems
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2024-0424
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
DesIgning Value in Ecosystems
Issue number
11
Volume number
29
Pages (from-to)
32-58
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Purpose
Design thinking is widely recognized as an effective problem-solving approach in the professional and academic world, albeit with varying interpretations. It has been studied in multiple forms – as a tool, a practice, a skill and a mindset – leading to ongoing debates about its fundamental nature. This study aims to explore the use of design thinking in practice and determine how its application varies depending on the characteristics of the innovation projects, namely, the types of goals pursued and the level of uncertainty involved.

Design/methodology/approach
Using a survey methodology and a knowledge-intensive empirical setting, this study analyzes a data set of 221 innovation consulting projects based on design thinking conducted by European consulting firms and design agencies.

Findings
By analyzing the survey data, the authors identify six distinct sets of design thinking practices: discovering user needs, understanding the problem addressed, challenging existing assumptions, navigating the problem-solution pair, ideating through visualizations and learning through prototypes. The authors also identify configurations of these design thinking practices that are used to address different innovation project goals and levels of uncertainty.

Practical implications
The study draws attention to the need for design thinking practitioners to be aware of how different innovation project goals and levels of uncertainty can be pursued/addressed through the use of alternative configurations of design thinking practices.

Originality/value
To the best of the authors knowledge, this study is one of the first large-scale quantitative analyses of the nature of design thinking in action, providing a solid foundation for future research on design thinking.