Understanding Risks and Moral Emotions in the Context of COVID-19 Policy Making

The Case of the Netherlands

Book Chapter (2022)
Author(s)

Sabine Roeser (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Department
Values Technology and Innovation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08424-9_11 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Department
Values Technology and Innovation
Pages (from-to)
201-214
ISBN (print)
978-3-031-08423-2
ISBN (electronic)
978-3-031-08424-9
Downloads counter
170
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In most countries, including the Netherlands, decision-making about the COVID-19 policy measures was initially based on medical information, and only later did it also include insights from social sciences. However, ethical implications of COVID-19 policy measures have not frequently been explicitly considered. As a result, critical ethical issues have been overlooked, and values, concerns, and emotions have not been considered appropriately. In this chapter, I will argue that emotions can help to make important moral dilemmas around decision-making about COVID-19 explicit and to make ethically justified decisions. I will do so by zooming in specifically on how the Netherlands has handled the pandemic so far. My discussion aims to contribute to morally better and more socially acceptable decision-making about the challenges that COVID-19 poses, as well as to hopefully learn lessons for possible future pandemics.