Structural insights into the contactin 1 – neurofascin 155 adhesion complex
Lucas M.P. Chataigner (Universiteit Utrecht)
Christos Gogou (Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, TU Delft - Applied Sciences)
Maurits A. den Boer (Netherlands Proteomics Center, Universiteit Utrecht)
Cátia P. Frias (TU Delft - Applied Sciences, Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft)
Dominique M.E. Thies-Weesie (Universiteit Utrecht)
Joke C.M. Granneman (Universiteit Utrecht)
Albert J.R. Heck (Universiteit Utrecht)
Dimphna H. Meijer (Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, TU Delft - Applied Sciences, TU Delft - Applied Sciences)
Bert J.C. Janssen (Universiteit Utrecht)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Cell-surface expressed contactin 1 and neurofascin 155 control wiring of the nervous system and interact across cells to form and maintain paranodal myelin-axon junctions. The molecular mechanism of contactin 1 – neurofascin 155 adhesion complex formation is unresolved. Crystallographic structures of complexed and individual contactin 1 and neurofascin 155 binding regions presented here, provide a rich picture of how competing and complementary interfaces, post-translational glycosylation, splice differences and structural plasticity enable formation of diverse adhesion sites. Structural, biophysical, and cell-clustering analysis reveal how conserved Ig1-2 interfaces form competing heterophilic contactin 1 – neurofascin 155 and homophilic neurofascin 155 complexes whereas contactin 1 forms low-affinity clusters through interfaces on Ig3-6. The structures explain how the heterophilic Ig1-Ig4 horseshoe’s in the contactin 1 – neurofascin 155 complex define the 7.4 nm paranodal spacing and how the remaining six domains enable bridging of distinct intercellular distances.