Structural insights into the contactin 1 – neurofascin 155 adhesion complex

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Lucas M.P. Chataigner (Universiteit Utrecht)

Christos Gogou (Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, TU Delft - Applied Sciences)

Maurits A. den Boer (Netherlands Proteomics Center, Universiteit Utrecht)

Cátia P. Frias (TU Delft - Applied Sciences, Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft)

Dominique M.E. Thies-Weesie (Universiteit Utrecht)

Joke C.M. Granneman (Universiteit Utrecht)

Albert J.R. Heck (Universiteit Utrecht)

Dimphna H. Meijer (Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, TU Delft - Applied Sciences, TU Delft - Applied Sciences)

Bert J.C. Janssen (Universiteit Utrecht)

Research Group
BN/Dimphna Meijer Lab
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34302-9 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Research Group
BN/Dimphna Meijer Lab
Journal title
Nature Communications
Issue number
1
Volume number
13
Article number
6607
Downloads counter
221
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Cell-surface expressed contactin 1 and neurofascin 155 control wiring of the nervous system and interact across cells to form and maintain paranodal myelin-axon junctions. The molecular mechanism of contactin 1 – neurofascin 155 adhesion complex formation is unresolved. Crystallographic structures of complexed and individual contactin 1 and neurofascin 155 binding regions presented here, provide a rich picture of how competing and complementary interfaces, post-translational glycosylation, splice differences and structural plasticity enable formation of diverse adhesion sites. Structural, biophysical, and cell-clustering analysis reveal how conserved Ig1-2 interfaces form competing heterophilic contactin 1 – neurofascin 155 and homophilic neurofascin 155 complexes whereas contactin 1 forms low-affinity clusters through interfaces on Ig3-6. The structures explain how the heterophilic Ig1-Ig4 horseshoe’s in the contactin 1 – neurofascin 155 complex define the 7.4 nm paranodal spacing and how the remaining six domains enable bridging of distinct intercellular distances.