An Exploratory Study on the Utility of Patient-Generated Health Data as a Tool for Health Care Professionals in Multiple Sclerosis Care

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Sharon Guardado (University of Oulu)

Vasiliki Mylonopoulou (University of Gothenburg)

Octavio Rivera-Romero (Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, University of Seville)

Nadine Patt (Rehabilitationszentrum Valens)

Jens Bansi (Rehabilitationszentrum Valens)

Guido Giunti (TU Delft - Human Factors, Trinity College Dublin, University of Oulu)

Research Group
Human Factors
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775718
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Group
Human Factors
Journal title
Methods of Information in Medicine
Issue number
5-6
Volume number
62
Pages (from-to)
165-173
Downloads counter
128
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Patient-generated health data (PGHD) are data collected through technologies such as mobile devices and health apps. The integration of PGHD into health care workflows can support the care of chronic conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients are often willing to share data with health care professionals (HCPs) in their care team; however, the benefits of PGHD can be limited if HCPs do not find it useful, leading patients to discontinue data tracking and sharing eventually. Therefore, understanding the usefulness of mobile health (mHealth) solutions, which provide PGHD and serve as enablers of the HCPs' involvement in participatory care, could motivate them to continue using these technologies.

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the perceived utility of different types of PGHD from mHealth solutions which could serve as tools for HCPs to support participatory care in MS.

Method: A mixed-methods approach was used, combining qualitative research and participatory design. This study includes three sequential phases: data collection, assessment of PGHD utility, and design of data visualizations. In the first phase, 16 HCPs were interviewed. The second and third phases were carried out through participatory workshops, where PGHD types were conceptualized in terms of utility.

Results: The study found that HCPs are optimistic about PGHD in MS care. The most useful types of PGHD for HCPs in MS care are patients' habits, lifestyles, and fatigue-inducing activities. Although these subjective data seem more useful for HCPs, it is more challenging to visualize them in a useful and actionable way.

Conclusion: HCPs are optimistic about mHealth and PGHD as tools to further understand their patients' needs and support care in MS. HCPs from different disciplines have different perceptions of what types of PGHD are useful; however, subjective types of PGHD seem potentially more useful for MS care.