Anaerobic stabilisation of urine diverting dehydrating toilet faeces (UDDT-F) in urban poor settlements

Biochemical energy recovery

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

J. Riungu (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

M. Ronteltap (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

JB Van Lier (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Copyright
© 2019 J. Riungu, Mariska Ronteltap, J.B. van Lier
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2019.099
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 J. Riungu, Mariska Ronteltap, J.B. van Lier
Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Issue number
2
Volume number
9
Pages (from-to)
289-299
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Biochemical energy recovery using digestion and co-digestion of faecal matter collected from urine diverting dehydrating toilet faeces (UDDT-F) and mixed organic market waste (OMW) was studied under laboratory-and pilot-scale conditions. Laboratory-scale biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests showed an increase in methane production with an increase in OMW fraction in the feed substrate. In subsequent pilot-scale experiments, one-stage and two-stage plug flow digester were researched, applying UDDT-F:OMW ratios of 4:1 and 1:0, at about 10 and 12% total solids (TS) slurry concentrations. Comparable methane production was observed in one-stage (Ro-4:1,12%) (314 ± 15 mL CH4/g VS added) and two-stage (Ram-4:1,12%) (325 ± 12 mL CH4 /g VS added) digesters, when applying 12% TS slurry concentration. However, biogas production in Ram-4:1,12% digester (571 ± 25 mL CH4/g VS added) was about 12% higher than in Ro-4:1,12%, significantly more than the slight difference in methane production, i.e. 3–4%. The former was attributed to enhanced waste solubilisation and increased CO2 dissolution, resulting from mixing the bicarbonate-rich methanogenic effluent for neutralisation purposes with the low pH (4.9) influent acquired from the pre-acidification stage. Moreover, higher process stability was observed in the first parts of the plug flow two-stage digester, characterised by lower VFA concentrations.