A comparison of natural and acoustic radiation force induced shear wave propagation speed measurements in open-chest pigs

Conference Paper (2019)
Author(s)

L. B.H. Keijzer (Erasmus MC)

Jason Voorneveld (Erasmus MC)

Daniel J. Bowen (Erasmus MC)

M. Strachinaru (Erasmus MC)

Antonius F.W. van der Steen (ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging , Erasmus MC)

N. de Jong (Erasmus MC, ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging )

J. G. Bosch (Erasmus MC)

H.J. Vos (ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging , Erasmus MC)

Annette Caenen (Erasmus MC)

ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8925723
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
ImPhys/Acoustical Wavefield Imaging
Volume number
2019-October
Pages (from-to)
2110-2113
ISBN (electronic)
9781728145969

Abstract

Different shear wave elastography methods have been proposed to measure cardiac material properties. This study compared shear waves naturally generated by aortic and mitral valve closure to those externally induced with an acoustic radiation force throughout the cardiac cycle. The shear wave timing and propagation speeds were measured in four pigs with open-chest recordings. Despite spatial and temporal differences in excitation source, the propagation speeds of the natural shear waves were found to be in the same range as the propagation speeds of the active shear waves. The results also suggested a large inter-beat variability for the natural shear waves.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.