Evaluating Graph Neural Additive Networks for Multi-Label Node Classification

How does Graph Neural Additive Network (GNAN) perform on different multi-label node classification datasets, and what do the resulting explanations reveal about the data?

Bachelor Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

A. Vlas (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

M. Khosla – Mentor (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

E. Congeduti – Mentor (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Graduation Date
19-06-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
CSE3000 Research Project
Programme
Computer Science and Engineering
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Downloads counter
23
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Graph Neural Additive Networks (GNANs) extend generalised additive models to graph-structured data, providing interpretability by design rather than through post-hoc explanation. GNANs have been studied on multi-class node classification, but not in the multi-label setting, where a single node may belong to several categories at once. This paper presents the first adaptation and evaluation of GNAN for multi-label node classification. We replace the softmax output with a per-label sigmoid and give the distance function a per-label output, and we benchmark the adapted model against standard baselines on two real-world graphs that span a high- and a low-homophily regime, reporting Average Precision (AP) as the primary metric. We then analyse the learned shape functions and distance function to ask whether the built-in explanations are meaningful. GNAN is competitive with strong message-passing graph neural networks on the high-homophily graph, coming within about four AP points of the best baseline, but it drops to the lower end of the baselines on the low-homophily graph. Its learned distance function adapts to label homophily: a steep, reproducible local decay when neighbours are informative, and a flat, unstable profile when they are not. These results characterise when GNAN’s additive structure is an advantage and when it is a limitation, and they demonstrate the practical value of interpretability by design in the multi-label graph setting.

Files

License info not available