Quality assessment of postgraduate safety education programs, current developments with examples of ten (post)graduate safety courses in Europe

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Paul Swuste (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Asun Galera (Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya)

Wim Van Wassenhove (PSL Université MINES ParisTech, GRC, Sophia Antipolis)

José Carretero-Gómez (University of the Balearic Islands)

Pedro Arezes (University of Minho)

Jouni Kivistö-Rahnasto (Tampere University)

Francisco Forteza (University of the Balearic Islands)

Gilles Motet (INSA Toulouse)

Kelly Reyniers (Universiteit Antwerpen)

undefined More Authors (External organisation)

Research Group
Safety and Security Science
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105338 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Research Group
Safety and Security Science
Journal title
Safety Science
Volume number
141
Article number
105338
Downloads counter
316
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Professionalization of safety is gaining some interest in international safety literature, including (post)graduate training and education of safety experts. Different from research, there are hardly any publications and discussions on the quality of (post) graduate safety education in the academic safety literature. This article starts with a short historical picture of safety education. After this picture, a description of the ten (post) graduate safety courses involved is presented with a special reference to the assessment of the quality of these courses. It shows that an internal evaluation of quality, like reactions from trainees, and results from examinations, and tests are presently the main quality indicators. Discussions on how quality assessment can be performed has led to an overview of literature on educational objectives and educational models, and possible options for this assessment. The article concludes that the transfer of safety knowledge and skills to companies and organizations is a highly desirable elaboration of the quality concept. But it is also clear that traditional safety indicators can provide no, or only unreliable, information about the degree of this transfer. An overview of possible minor and major accident scenarios of the company or organisation concerned might be a better option, combined with the activities of the trainee to influence and prevent activation of these scenarios.